The world of Rolex collecting is rife with myths and misconceptions, and one of the most persistent revolves around the existence of a "no holes case" Rolex, specifically a no-date Submariner. The idea of a Rolex Submariner, particularly the iconic 16610, without the characteristic lug holes, captures the imagination of many enthusiasts. However, the reality is far simpler: Rolex never produced a Submariner, date or no-date, without the drilled lug holes. This article will delve into the history and specifics surrounding this persistent myth, examining the various model lines and clarifying the common confusion.
The Persistent Myth and its Origins
The rumour of a "no holes" Rolex Submariner likely stems from a few sources. Firstly, the subtle visual differences between various Rolex models, especially across different production years, can lead to misinterpretations. The angle of a photograph, the lighting, and even the condition of the watch can make lug holes appear less prominent or even seemingly absent. Secondly, the desire for a rare and unique variant fuels speculation. Collectors are always on the lookout for unusual variations, and the allure of a truly unique Rolex Submariner without lug holes is understandably attractive. Finally, the existence of aftermarket modifications, such as filled lug holes, further clouds the issue. Some unscrupulous sellers might attempt to pass off a modified watch as a genuine "no holes" example.
Understanding Rolex Lug Holes
Before we debunk the myth, let's understand the purpose and significance of the lug holes in Rolex watches. These holes, precisely drilled into the lugs (the small protrusions on the case that connect to the bracelet), are crucial for attaching the bracelet securely. They allow for the insertion of spring bars, which hold the bracelet in place. Without these holes, attaching the bracelet would be impossible using the standard Rolex system. The lug holes are an integral part of the watch's design and construction, and their absence would fundamentally alter the watch's functionality and integrity.
The Rolex 14060M and its Lug Holes
The Rolex 14060M, often cited in discussions about "no holes" Submariners, is a frequently misunderstood model. The 14060M is a no-date Submariner, and it *always* features drilled lug holes. Any claim suggesting otherwise is inaccurate. The 14060M was produced for approximately a decade, from the mid-1990s to the mid-2000s, and throughout its entire production run, the lug holes were a consistent feature. There is no documented variation or special edition lacking these holes.
The Rolex 16610 and its Inseparable Lug Holes
The Rolex 16610, the date Submariner, is another model frequently associated with the "no holes" misconception. Similar to the 14060M, the 16610, produced for approximately three decades (roughly from 1988 to 2007), *always* had lug holes. The variations within the 16610's production run relate to dial variations, bezel inserts, and movement upgrades, but the lug holes remained a constant. There are no credible sources or documented examples of a 16610 without them. Any purported "no holes" 16610 is almost certainly a forgery or a significantly altered watch.
current url：https://oywfuf.c425n.com/all/no-holes-case-rolex-99332